Defenses to Denaturalization
September 22, 2020
2:00 PM (ET)
With the creation of a new Denaturalization Section at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), an increase in DOJ’s prosecution of denaturalization cases is expected. It is, therefore, very important for immigration practitioners to understand the denaturalization process and become versed in potential defenses and strategies. Simply relying on the fact that the government must meet a high burden of proof when attempting to revoke an individual’s naturalization by civil proceedings, or as a result of a criminal conviction for naturalization fraud, is not enough. Our expert panelists will provide historical and legal background, practical tips, litigation strategies, and potential defenses to both civil denaturalization and denaturalization in the criminal conviction context.
- How and Where Are Denaturalization Proceedings Initiated?
- Legal Grounds, Procedural Prerequisites, and Process for Denaturalizing a U.S. Citizen Who Has the Burden of Proof? How High Is That Burden?
- What Potential Defenses Are There to Denaturalization? What Can You Achieve Via Discovery?
- Updates Regarding Operation Janus, Operation Second Look, and the Denaturalization Section of DOJ
- The Effects of COVID-19 on Denaturalization Cases
Anis N. Saleh (DL), Miami, FL
Anis N. Saleh is President of the Miami firm of Saleh & Associates, P.A. Mr. Saleh is AV-rated by Martindale-Hubbell and is listed in The Best Lawyers in America, Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business and
David W. Leopold, AILA Past President, Cleveland, OH
David W. Leopold Partner and Group Leader of Ulmer’s Immigration Law Group, and Past President and GC of AILA, counsels domestic and foreign businesses, health care institutions, law firms, religious institutions, nonprofits, and other entities on U.S. immigration, visa, and citizenship law. Serving as a “go-to” analyst of immigration issues for major media outlets including The New York Times, The Washington Post, and more, David regularly handles high-profile, politically charged matters that draw national attention.
Kathrin S. Mautino, San Diego, CA
Kathrin S. Mautino is certified as a specialist in immigration and nationality law by the State Bar of California, Board of Legal Specialization, one of fewer than 200 attorneys in the state presently designated. A cum laude graduate of the University of San Diego School of Law, Ms. Mautino is the managing partner of Kathrin S. Mautino APLC, a San Diego firm. Ms. Mautino is a recognized expert in American citizenship law.
Christopher W. Dempsey, Former Chief, National Security & Affirmative Litigation Unit, OIL, DOJ, Jacksonville, FL
Christopher W. Dempsey served with DOJ in Washington, D.C. for over a decade, where he supervised all national security litigation by an office of over 75 attorneys and led a Unit conducting immigration-related, affirmative and defensive litigation in district courts and courts of appeal across the nation, with an emphasis on denaturalization cases. Mr. Dempsey regularly trained Department attorneys in Washington, D.C. and the National Advocacy Center, and instructed law enforcement officers throughout the U.S. Mr. Dempsey now owns and operates Dempsey Law, PLLC, a multijurisdictional immigration law practice.
|AILA Member/International Associates||$129|
|AILA Members’ Paralegals||$129|
|AILA Nonprofit Members||$129|
|AILA Law Student Members||$129|
The Defenses to Denaturalization web seminar takes place Tuesday, September 22, 2020, at the times noted below:
- 2:00 pm–3:30 pm eastern time
- 1:00 pm–2:30 pm central time
- 12:00 pm–1:30 pm mountain time
- 11:00 am–12:30 pm pacific time
Tuition AssistanceFull and partial tuition assistance will be offered to participants based on need and availability for all audio and web seminars. Please complete the tuition assistance application for consideration.
AILA has filed for CLE and specialized credit in all jurisdictions with mandatory CLE requirements. For details about specific approvals, please contact us at email@example.com.
- AILA applies for accreditation upon attorneys request after participation for the following states: AR, DE, IA, ID, KY, LA, ME, MN, MS, OR, and WY. Programs are typically approved.
- Florida and Rhode Island - Attorneys must apply on their own for approval of seminars in FL and RI. Programs are typically approved.
To receive CLE credit, attorneys must record seminar attendance and the CLE code provided within one week of the seminar date via webCLE.
webCLE Terms and Conditions
Please read the webCLE terms and conditions carefully before using this webCLE website. If you do not wish to be bound by these terms and conditions, please do not access or use this site.
If you have any questions about the webCLE terms and conditions or webCLE, please contact: CLE@aila.org.